![]() ![]() ![]() The other advantage with AndroVid is that there is a pro version for which the functionality in terms of max clip length. Performance is fine again and the big upshot is that the advertising is nowhere near as annoying as with other apps.ĪndroVid does also makes it easier to trim middle sections out of a clip in your sequence. Still, the interface (especially when using the ‘timeline’ type sequence)can be slightly inferior. The functionality is slightly better than Andromedia Video Editor. Plus, the free version has ads that can be annoying when they start opening everywhere. The main downsides of the app are that it can sometimes be slow. Although rendering can take quite a while if editing a longer sequence (anything over a couple of minutes). Rendering and exporting works reasonably well. ![]() You can try trimming clips, changing their order, and inserting transitions in an obvious and logical manner. your entire sequence) and offers basic editing functions. The main upside is the interface which balances accessibility and functionality. It’ll run reasonably well on anything roughly equivalent to a Samsung Galaxy or better. This is probably the best of what’s currently available. Within, an average smartphone is able to make basic video editing.Īs we had pro desktop editing software (both Avid Media Composer and Adobe Creative Suite) we will evaluate apps mainly on their functionality, performance and the ease of use. These are the free apps that are currently taking the best advantage of the impressive hardware specs. Below is a round-up of our top 5 picks for video editing on an Android handset. Video editing on Android phones became an easy thing to do.Įventhough a 4.3″ to 4.8″ is hardly a monster screen compared with a 28″ desktop display, it is enough to do some basic video editing. Anyone with a new phone can have a fast CPU right in their pocket. ![]() Smartphones are scarily powerful these days. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |